Johann Philipp Murray’s Correspondence with Albrecht von Haller
edited by Otto Sonntag, hallerNet 2021

Göttingische Anzeigen von gelehrten Sachen (GGA)

Beginning in 1753, the privilege of publishing the GGA was granted to the GdW. After Haller’s return to Switzerland that spring, Michaelis was appointed the journal’s director, but in later years he expected the GdW secretaries to help with its day-to-day operations. The GGA was thus a frequent topic in Murray’s correspondence with its most prolific contributor. Haller worried in 1763 that a packet with some eighty of his reviews had been lost. Their loss would mean that he would have to read the books a second time, in order to have a sense of their content for his own purposes, and that he would lose 40 thaler in compensation. Two years later Murray sought to assure Haller that various of his reviews were already in print, or were about to be. Into the 1770s Haller continued to await copies of the GGA with impatience. In February 1767 Murray reported that the journal had too few contributors and that they did not harmonize enough with Director Michaelis. He also regretted that he himself had not learned from Haller the art of reviewing “so geschwind, und doch so kernhaft.”

26
He observed in May 1768 that he had written a notice of a paper by Haller that he read at the GdW; if he did not like it, he went on, Haller should in the future supply his own notice along with the paper, “denn kein Fremder kann so leicht die Gedanken eines Schriftstellers so concentriren, als er selbst.”
27
Reviewing one’s own works clearly did not violate any norms of the time.

Some of the errors that showed up in Haller’s published reviews were attributable to his difficult handwriting. In 1765 Murray offered an unusual defense for the policy of not publishing an erratum that Haller had compiled: readers would not attribute errors to the reviewer, he held, least of all to one so far away. Nevertheless, he promised that more care would be taken in the future to minimize mistakes. If alerted to Haller’s reviews of Swedish books, he himself would proofread them. In the summer of 1770 he hoped that Haller would find fewer errors, as a result of recently introduced measures.

In June 1769 he volunteered a positive assessment of the GGA: “Unsere Anzeigen steigen in ihrem Ruhm von Tag zu Tage.”

28
He supported that claim mainly by citing the contributors of historical reviews. He also welcomed the proposal to sell remaining issues of the GGA from prior years at a low price, for it promised a sizable revenue. In August 1769 he spoke of a surplus of reviews. Doubting that plans to bring out Zugaben would be implemented in 1770, he suggested that Haller write fewer reviews and instead prepare one or two papers for the GdW on a physical topic.